也论民事诉讼法律责任制度  

Also on Legal Liability System of Civil Proceedings

作　　者：李喜莲[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院

出　　处：《法学评论》2014年第6期97-105,共9页Law Review

基　　金：湖南省社会科学基金项目<民事诉讼法律责任研究>(项目编号:12YBA284)的阶段性成果;法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心平台建设的阶段性成果

摘　　要：剖析我国民事诉讼法律责任制度的现状,不难发现其既没有明确法官违法审判的诉讼法律责任,也没有明确当事人之间及当事人与其他诉讼参与人之间的诉讼法律责任。造成这一现象的原因主要是"重实体,轻程序"观念的掣肘和前苏联民事诉讼法律关系理论的影响。在程序违法现象屡禁不止的现实背景下,重构民事诉讼法律责任制度尤显必要。诉讼法律责任具有自身的独特性,且该制度是确保民事诉讼程序自治和实现诉讼公正及诉讼效率的必要保障。因此,强化正当程序理念,整合现有法律规范,明确法官违法审判的诉讼法律责任,细化当事人之间及当事人与其他诉讼参与人之间的诉讼法律责任,使民事诉讼法律责任制度实现体系化并切实得到落实,乃是确保民事诉讼法正常施行的必要举措。Analysing the current civil legal liability system, we find that it neither clear the legal liability for jud- ges＇ illegal trial nor clear the legal liability between the parties or other participants in the proceedings. There are two main reasons for the results. One is the ＂heavy entity, light program＂ concept constrainting people from paying attention to proeuderal legal liaibility. The other is we influenced by civil legal relations theory of the former Soviet Union deeply. As we all know that illegal procedure still be repeated. Therefore, reconstructing the civil procedure legal liability system is particularly necessary. In fact, procedural legal liability has its own characteristics. This sys- tem is necessary to ensure civil procedural autonomy, and to realize litigation justice and litigation efficiency. In or- der to construct effective civil procedure legal liability system, we must strengthen the idea of due process, integrate the existing laws and regulations, clear the legal liaibility for judges＇ illegal trial, and refine the legal liability be- tween parties so on. After all, all of those measures are necessary to ensure that civil procedure law to be implemen- ted effectively and regularly.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 法律责任 程序自治 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]