检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院妇科肿瘤科,100026
出 处:《北京医学》2014年第11期920-922,共3页Beijing Medical Journal
基 金:首都医学发展基金(2007-1049)
摘 要:目的比较不同化疗疗程对早期卵巢上皮癌患者生存率和无瘤生存率的影响。方法 180例患者按预后风险因素及化疗疗程分组,无瘤生存率及生存率采用Kaplan-Meier法估算,采用Log-Rank检验进行比较。结果≤4疗程(Ⅰ组)及﹥4疗程(Ⅱ组)5年总生存率(5-OS)、2年无瘤生存率(2-DFS)及5年无瘤生存率(5-DFS)分别为54.1%、51.6%、47.8%,48.3%、41.8%、40.0%;两组5-OS、2-DFS及5-DFS的差异均无统计学意义(P=0.926,P=0.713)。高危组和低危组患者5-OS、2-DFS及5-DFS分别为45.6%、84.7%,38.5%、93.5%,32.9%、77.5%;两组5-OS、2-DFS及5-DFS差异有统计学意义(P均=0.000)。高危组中≤4疗程(A1组)及﹥4疗程(A2组)5-OS、2-DFS及5-DFS分别为39.6%、48.5%,26.8%、43.7%,26.8%、36.0%;两组5-OS差异无统计学意义(P=0.314),A1组2-DFS及5-DFS均低于A2组(P=0.011)。低危组中≤4疗程化疗及﹥4疗程5-OS、2-DFS及5-DFS分别为85.1%、83.3%,95.0%、90.9%,77.7%、77.9%;两组5-OS、2-DFS及5-DFS差异无统计学意义(P>0.5)。结论高危组早期上皮性卵巢癌患者术后予大于4疗程化疗可提高其无瘤生存率。Objective To compare 5-year overall survival rate (5-OS) and disease-free survival rate (DFS) on early stage epithelia ovarian cancer patients with different chemotherapy cycles. Methods One hundred and eighty patients were divided into different groups based on the cycles of chemotherapy and prognostic risk factors. SPSS13.0 Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to estimate 5-OS and DFS. Log-rank test was employed to compare the differences in 5-OS and DFS. Results The 5-OS, 2-DFS and 5-DFS of less than 4 cycles of chemotherapy and more than 4 chemotherapy was 54.1%, 51.6%, 47.8%and 48.3%, 41.8%, 40.0%. The 5-OS, the 2-DFS and 5-DFS with different cy-cles of chemotherapy was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.926, P=0.713). The 5-OS, 2-DFS and 5-DFS of the high-risk group and the low-risk group were 45.6%, 84.7%, 38.5% and 93.5%, 32.9%, 77.5%. The 5-OS, the 2-DFS and 5-DFS with different cycles of chemotherapy were significantly different between the two groups (P=0.000, P= 0.000). In the high-risk group, the 5-OS, 2-DFS and 5-DFS of less than 4 cycles of chemotherapy and more than 4 chemotherapy was 39.6%, 48.5%, 26.8% and 43.7%, 26.8%, 36.0%. The 5-OS was not significantly different be-tween the two groups (P= 0.314). The 2-DFS and 5-DFS of more than 4 chemotherapy was higher (P= 0.011). In the low-risk group, the 5-OS, 2-DFS and 5-DFS of less than 4 cycles of chemotherapy and more than 4 chemotherapy were 85.1%, 83.3%, 95.0% and 90.9%, 77.7%, 77.9%. The 5-OS, the 2-DFS and 5-DFS were not significantly different between the two groups (P= 0.596, P= 0.760). Conclusion More than 4 cycles of chemotherapy can improve the dis-ease-free survival rate in high-risk early stage epithelial ovarian cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222