印证还是心证:刑事质证的迷局与解困  

Evidence Conviction or Moral Conviction:Dilemma and Countermeasure of the Criminal Impeachment

作　　者：朱锡平 

机构地区：[1]江苏省南京市鼓楼区人民法院研究室

出　　处：《犯罪研究》2014年第5期2-17,共16页Chinese Criminology Review

摘　　要：证据间的相互印证不仅仅是证据基本特征的外部印证,更重要的是运用逻辑证明、经验验证等内省方法,对单个证据证明能力和证明力的判断。实践中忽视证据能力的审查,主张证据相互印证作为证据采信和定案的依据,催生了刑讯逼供、冤假错案等印证规则负价值。提升法官自由心证能力,合理规制法官自由裁量权,尊重律师辩权和辩护意见,坚守审判中心主义,为证据印证规则划出合理的底线是可能的破解方法。Confirm each other more than just the basic characteristics of external evidence confirms the evidence room, more important is the use of logical proof, introspective experience verification methods, the ability of individual evidence and probative force of the judgment. In practice the ability to examine the evidence of neglect, advocates of evidence confirm each other as admissible evidence and basis for decision, gave birth to the torture, miscarriages of justice, such as the rules prove a negative value. Enhance the ability of judges free evaluation of evidence, the bottom line is reasonable regulation of judges discretion, the right to respect for and defense lawyers argued opinions, stick to tried-centrism, the rules of evidence confirms it is possible to draw a reasonable crack method.

关 键 词：印证 口供 法定证据 自由心证 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]