“物象化”“物化”还是“对象化”?——从思想史和马克思文本出发的理论选择  

" Versachlichung", " Verdinglichung" or " Vergegenstandlichung" ?

作　　者：周嘉昕[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学马克思主义社会理论研究中心,哲学系

出　　处：《哲学研究》2014年第12期10-15,123,共6页Philosophical Research

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"马克思的生产方式理论与历史唯物主义理论创新研究"(编号10CZX004)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在马克思主义哲学研究中，“物化”是一个颇为引人关注的概念。特别是在与“青年马克思”的“异化”概念相比较的意义上，对于“物化”的追问更是构成了历史唯物主义研究不断深化的重要动力。近年来，随着马克思文本研究的推进和现代思想史语境的进一步廓清，围绕“物化”概念出现了一系列具有开拓性和创新价值的探索。The concept of reification is one of the key words in Marxists philosophy studies.With the first positions in Lukacs,and the fruitful researches in Japanese and Chinese Marxist scholars,the comparative studies between 'reification' and 'alienation', 'Versachlichung' and 'Verdinglichung',are playing an important role in the contemporary historical materialism studies.Going back to the original texts and intellectual process of Marx,it is to be found that there will be problems in defining the essence of Marxist philosophy with ' Versachlichung' or 'Verdinglichung',and in order to understand Marx's logic accurately,the mode of usage of the terms should be studied carefully.We therefore could find the scientific route with 'Verdinglichung' and related categories in the comprehension of historical materialism.

关 键 词：马克思文本 “物化” 思想史 对象化 物象化 马克思主义哲学研究 历史唯物主义 青年马克思 

分 类 号：B223.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学]