植入式静脉输液港与经外周中心静脉置管在化疗患者中的应用效果对比  

Comparison of the application between implantable venous access port and peripherally inserted central catheter in patients undergoing chemotherapy

作　　者：李静[1] 

机构地区：[1]濮阳市人民医院肿瘤内科,河南濮阳457001

出　　处：《河南医学研究》2014年第10期110-113,共4页Henan Medical Research

摘　　要：目的:比较植入式静脉输液港与经外周中心静脉置管在化疗患者中的应用效果。方法:选取156例行化学治疗的肿瘤患者,按照静脉给药方法的不同分为对照组(经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管,94例)和观察组(植入式静脉输液港,62例)。比较两组患者导管留置时间和并发症发生情况。结果:观察组患者导管留置平均时间为(197.64±96.73)d,对照组为(95.01±34.23)d,观察组患者导管留置时间明显较对照组长(P<0.05)。观察组导管相关并发症发生率为4.84%,对照组为14.90%,观察组并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:与经外周中心静脉置管相比,植入式静脉输液港可显著延长化疗患者导管留置时间并减少并发症发生。Objective： To compare the application between implantable venous access port and pe- ripherally inserted central catheter in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods： 156 patients with tumor undergoing chemotherapy were selected and divided into control group （peripherally in- serted central catheter, 94 cases） and observation group （implantable venous access port, 62 ca- ses）. The retaining time of catheter and the complication rates were compared between two groups. Results： The retaining time of catheter in observation group and control group were （ 197.64 ± 96.73 ） d and （95.01 ± 34.23 ） d respectively, The retaining time of catheter in observation group was longer than control group （P 〈 0.05）. The incidences of catheter-related complication in ob- servation group and control group were 4.84% and 14.90% respectively, The incidence of cathe- ter-related complication in observation group was lower than control group （P 〈 0.05）. Conclu- sion： Compared with peripherally inserted central catheter, implantable venous access port could significantly prolong the retaining time of catheter and reduce the incidence of complication.

关 键 词：植入式静脉输液港 经外周中心静脉置管 化疗 应用 

分 类 号：R730.5[医药卫生—肿瘤]