检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第6期129-136,164,共8页Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:要解决中国当前刑事诉讼场域中案多人少、司法资源紧张的困境,就要从刑事程序本身出发,充分挖掘刑事审前程序对案件的承载力与解压力,通过诉讼设槛与程序分流对刑事案件进行过滤、筛选、屏蔽和消解,实现导向与过滤的双重价值。具体宜从完善诉讼门槛设置、拓宽程序分流措施两方面入手,通过理顺立案与侦查的关系,建立法定化、多元化和分阶段的证明标准体系,完善不起诉制度等程序分流制度与措施,实现刑事审前程序承载能力的最大最优化。At present,the prominent problem in the criminal procedure fields is the fact that there are too many cases for the law-officers to deal with and the judicial resources are seriously overloading.To solve this problem,we must look back on the procedures themselves and fully develop the Functions of Cases Loading and Pressure Relieving on Criminal Pretrial Procedures.Concretely,we can take measures such as perfecting the lawsuit threshold setting,broadening the diversion measures,strengthening the relationship of filling and investigation,building the delimitation.diversifying the proof standard system of criminal evidences,improving the procedures of prosecution system,in order to maximize the cases loading and pressure relieving on criminal pretrial procedures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145