检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门大学新闻传播学院,厦门361005 [2]福建师范大学传播学院,福州350001
出 处:《现代广告》2014年第21期17-24,共8页Modern Advertising
基 金:本文是国家社会科学基金项目(批准号10BXW033)“台湾政治广告研究”的研究成果之一(This study was supported by National Social Science Foundation).
摘 要:在台湾五届“总统”直选中,2000和2008年两届为在野党获胜而实现政党轮替的两次选举。本研究分析了两届选举中的447则报纸竞选广告,以探析双方策略差异和对胜败可能造成的影响。结果发现,败选方竞选广告具有如下特点:仅在2个议题上广告占优势,较多利用理性诉求,重视形象塑造;胜选在野方的特点是:在10个议题上广告占优势,较多政党署名。In Taiwan "presidential" elections in 2000 and 2008, both incumbent parties were defeated and led to transition of political parties. This research, based on 447 pieces of campaign advertisement on newspaper in the two elections, tries to explore campaign strategies of both sides and their possible effects. Results show that incumbent party which lost the election adopts advertising strategies as following: concentrating on two topics, preferring rational appeal, and making great effort to build a good image; while challenging party which won the elections talked about 10 topics in ads and used more ads bylined by the party.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.205