检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东医学院公共卫生学院流行病学与卫生统计学教研室,广东东莞523808 [2]煤炭总医院医务科,北京100028
出 处:《重庆医学》2014年第33期4507-4509,共3页Chongqing medicine
基 金:东莞市医疗卫生科技计划项目(20131051010004);广东医学院流行病与卫生统计学重点学科项目(XZ1105)
摘 要:目的通过探讨后勤管理人员工作满意度潜在因素结构,评价调查表结构效度。方法采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)评价调查表的结构效度。结果 EFA将调查表归为6个因子,分别从属于工作满意度和职业忠诚度,每个因子能得到合理解释,累积贡献率达70.306%。工作满意度部分EFA归为5个公因子,解释70.514%信息量。用LISREL8.70软件进行CFA得到模型1和模型2,X2自由度比小于5,除调整拟合优度指数(AGFI)略小于0.9,其他拟合指数均大于0.9,标准化残差均方根(SRMR)和近似误差均方根(RMSEA)均小于0.08。结论 EFA和CFA均显示调查表具有较好的结构效度。Objective To confirm the structure validity of questionnaire through a probe into latent factorial structure of the rear service personnel′s job satisfaction from polyclinics hospitals .Methods The questionnaire′s construct validity was estimated by ex‐ploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) .Results Exploratory factor analysis made the question‐naire including six factors which belonged to job satisfaction and occupation loyalty .Every factor had reasonable explanation and six factors remained 70 .306% information .Exploratory factor analysis of job satisfaction showed five factors ,explaining 70 .514% in‐formation .The confirmatory factor analysis model 1 and model 2 were conducted by LISREL8 .70 software .The results showed that X2 freedom degree was less than 5 .In addition to adjust the goodness of fit index was less than 0 .9 ,all other fit indices were greater than 0 .9 .At the same time ,SRMR and RMSEA were less than 0 .08 .Conclusion The results of exploratory factor analysis(EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) both reveal that the questionnaire′s construct validity was good .
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145