检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张志岷[1] 滕忠强[1] 陈瑀[1] 王彦蕊[1]
机构地区:[1]福建卫生职业技术学院附属医院(福建省级机关医院)呼吸内科,福建福州350003
出 处:《吉林医学》2014年第33期7346-7347,共2页Jilin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:探讨纤维支气管镜(简称纤支镜)的不同病理活检取材方法对确诊肺癌的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析83例肺癌患者纤维支气管镜检查结果,比较分析钳检/TBLB、刷检、针吸活检(TBNA)和冲洗等方法诊断肺癌的阳性率。结果:钳检、刷检、冲洗、TBNA阳性率分别是86.3%、56.1%、41.0%、9.1%,联合以上三种取材方法阳性率为92.5%。结论:联合应用纤维支气管镜多种取材方法可提高肺癌的检出率。Objective To exploer the diagnosis value of different drawing materials methods with fibrobronchoscope in lung cancer Methods Clinical date of eighty- three lung cancer inpatients examined by fibrobronchoscope during 2009 ~ 2012 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Four different drawing materials method including clamping /TBLB,brushing,needling and rinse check were used to diagnose. Results The positive rates of protractor biopsy,brush biopsy,rinse and needling check,were,respectively,86. 3% 、56. 1% 、41. 0% 、9. 1%. The positive rates using the above- mentioned three methods combined was 92. 5%. Conclusion The positive rate of diagnosing lung cancer can be improved if a combined sample- selection method with fibrobron choscope is used.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117