检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:倪科[1]
出 处:《湖北文理学院学报》2014年第11期23-25,共3页Journal of Hubei University of Arts and Science
摘 要:篮球运动深受大学生喜爱,也是普通本科院校体育课程中的主要项目.但常规篮球课程教学周期长,涉及学生人数多,分解式的教学方法往往不甚理想.为提高篮球课的教学效率,将传统的分解式教学法与完整练习法进行对比教学实验.结果发现:相比传统分解式教学而言,完整练习法教学过程不枯燥,学生接受度更高.同时由于完整练习法大幅增加了课堂比赛时间,学生有更多的时间对所学的篮球个人技战术进行灵活运用与练习,最终用相对较短的学时掌握基本技巧.该方法通过调动学生学习篮球的积极性,充分发挥学生的主观能动性,提高了课堂教学质量.Basketball is one of the most popular activities in ordinary colleges and universities. The students love it. And the basketball is regarded as the main optional course in the college physical education course. Due to the long teaching period and the numerous amount of the students, the effect of the disassembled exercise teaching is not very good. Comparatively speaking, the completed exercise teaching is not dull and is admitted by the majority of the students. Meanwhile, classroom competition time increases sharply in the process of completed exercise, the students can flexibly apply his own technique and tactics on the basketball method, taking relatively shorter time to grasp basic skills.
分 类 号:G807.4[文化科学—体育训练] G841[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.193.52