民营企业家集资诈骗罪:问题与思考  

Study on Major Issues of the Crime of Fund- Raising Fraud with Respect to Private Entrepreneurs: Question & Thinking

作　　者：赵秉志[1] 徐文文[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《法学杂志》2014年第12期1-17,共17页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：在认定集资诈骗罪时,对非法占有目的的认定,应该强调坚持主客观相统一的刑事责任原则,避免客观的依结果归罪;对诈骗行为的认定,应该关注行为人的欺诈行为与被害人的被骗行为间的互动。就本文述及的两个典型案件而言,不宜认定吴英构成集资诈骗罪,可考虑以非法吸收公众存款罪对吴英定罪;因涉案数据的真实性、客观性备受质疑,无法认定曾成杰构成了非法吸收公众存款罪还是集资诈骗罪。在集资诈骗罪的死刑适用时,既要避免唯数额论的倾向,又要充分考虑被害人过错和舆情民意对量刑所起的作用,在司法实践中尽量严格限制死刑适用,以尽快推动立法上废止集资诈骗罪的死刑。As for the crime of fund - raising fraud, when identifying the purpose ot illegal possession, the criminal liability rule of the unification of subjectivity and objectivity should be emphasized, and the objective conviction according to the results should be avoided; when identifying the fraud, the interaction between cheating and being cheated should be more concerned about. With regard to the two typical cases, it is more suitable to consider Wu Ying to commit the crime of illegal absorbing public deposits, rather than the crime of fund - raising fraud; due to the controversial authenticity of the data involved, it is difficult to identify which crimes Zeng Chengjie committed, the crime of illegal absorbing public deposits or the crime of fund - raising fraud. As for the application of death penalty in the crime of fund - raising fraud, it is important to avoid the amount only tendency as well as fully consider the fault of victims and the public opinion, in order to limit the application of death penalty as much as possible in judicial practice and to promote the legislative abolishment of death penalty as soon as possible.

关 键 词：集资诈骗罪 吴英案 曾成杰案 死刑适用 死刑废止 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]