纸片法和国标法对食品霉菌检验效果比较  

Effect comparison of paper method and national standard method on food mould inspection

作　　者：郝三虎 徐应根 石茂林 

机构地区：[1]望江县疾病预防控制中心,安徽望江246200

出　　处：《现代医药卫生》2014年第23期3554-3555,共2页Journal of Modern Medicine & Health

摘　　要：目的比较纸片法和国标法对食品霉菌的检验效果。方法采样标本来自安徽省望江县疾病预防控制中心质管科送检的糕点、饮料等共416份,其中糕点317份,饮料99份。所有样本均同时采用纸片法和国标法进行霉菌检验,比较2种方法的检验效果。结果国标法检测糕点、饮料的合格率[75.7%(240/317)、63.6%(63/99)]与纸片法检测糕点、饮料的合格率[78.9%(250/317)、65.7%(65/99)]比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.899、0.088,P>0.05)。结论2种方法均可准确检验食品中的霉菌,但相对国标法而言,纸片法更快速、简便、有效、实用,可替代国标法。Objective To compare the paper method and national standard method for food mould inspection. Methods Took 416 samples of pastries,drinks and others from the center quality management division in Wangjiang County Center for Disease Prevention and Control of Anhui province. inlcuding 317 pastries and 99 drinks ,all of which were sent to conduct mould inspection by paper method and national standard methods. It should be compared their results. Results Among them,the quali-fication rate of pastries and drinks by the national standard method was 75.5%and 63.%respectively while those by paper method 78.9%、65.7%,which showed the two methods had no statistcal significane in difference （χ^2=0.899,0.088,P〉0.05）. Conclu-sion The two method is avaliable for mould inspection while the paper method is quicker ,simpler,more effective and more practical, who may replace the national standard method.

关 键 词：色谱法 纸层 食品检查 真菌 国标法 霉菌检测 

分 类 号：R155.31[医药卫生—营养与食品卫生学]