劳动仲裁时效完成的法律效力研究  

The Legal Effect of Fulfillment of Labor Arbitration Prescription:Based on Principle of Prescription

作　　者：李文涛[1] 赵洪石[1] 孙晓[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国劳动关系学院法学系,北京100048

出　　处：《中国劳动关系学院学报》2014年第5期25-28,共4页Journal of China University of Labor Relations

基　　金：2013年中国劳动关系学院院级课题"劳动履行中的变更问题研究"(项目编号:13YY019)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：时效制度的核心在于对信赖利益的维护和现存社会秩序的尊重,但诉讼时效完成并不影响当事人的实体权利与义务关系,诉讼时效完成抗辩的援引取决于当事人的意思。依据时效的基本原理,基于劳动者权益之特别保护,在劳动者请求权的仲裁时效完成时,诉讼时效完成的法律规则完全可以适用,即仲裁机构应当受理劳动者的仲裁申请,并依法裁决,至于是否援引仲裁时效完成抗辩则取决于用人单位。用人单位不主张时效完成抗辩而向劳动者履行义务的,该履行合法有效。The prescription which its key issue is the protection of reliable interest and current social order does not affect the rights and obligations which means that the counterplea belongs to litigant. Moreover based on the principle of prescription and the protection of employee when the labor arbitration of employee fulfills the regulations of prescription can be applied. So arbitral agency should accept and hear a case and a plea of time hinge on employer. And then employer who does not claim a plea of time may fulfill obligations.

关 键 词：时效 劳动仲裁 抗辩 法律效力 

分 类 号：D922.5[政治法律—民商法学]