出 处:《Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Medical Sciences)》2014年第6期942-949,共8页华中科技大学学报(医学英德文版)
基 金:supported by grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China(Nos.81271406 and 81000537);Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China(No.NCET-09-0394)
摘 要:There is continuous debate regarding the effectiveness of thymectomy in the treatment of non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis (MG). This systematic review was undertaken to determine whether thymectomy was effective in non-thymomatous MG. We retrieved articles published between January 1980 and September 2013. Sixteen cohort studies were included. Given the considerable het- erogeneity, we used a descriptive method instead of statistical synthesis. The median relative rates (RRs) and their interquartile ranges were used to estimate the magnitude of benefit. Compared to conserva- tively treated MG patients, thymectomized patients had higher survival, clinical remission, pharma- cologic remission and improvement rates, and RRs were 1.07 (1.01-1.17), 1.83 (0.82-2.99), 1.55 (1.22-1.95) and 1 (1.00-1.09), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that patients with moderate to severe generalized MG benefited more from thymeetomy, with RRs of survival and pharmacologic re- mission increasing to 1.35 (1.24-1.49) and 2.68 (1.73-4.17), respectively. These results suggested that thymectomy might be an effective procedure in non-thymomatous MG patients. The patients with mod- erate to severe generalized MG might benefit more. Taking into account the poor methodological qual- ity of present studies, more well-designed prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still re- quired to reach uneouivocal conclusion.There is continuous debate regarding the effectiveness of thymectomy in the treatment of non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis (MG). This systematic review was undertaken to determine whether thymectomy was effective in non-thymomatous MG. We retrieved articles published between January 1980 and September 2013. Sixteen cohort studies were included. Given the considerable het- erogeneity, we used a descriptive method instead of statistical synthesis. The median relative rates (RRs) and their interquartile ranges were used to estimate the magnitude of benefit. Compared to conserva- tively treated MG patients, thymectomized patients had higher survival, clinical remission, pharma- cologic remission and improvement rates, and RRs were 1.07 (1.01-1.17), 1.83 (0.82-2.99), 1.55 (1.22-1.95) and 1 (1.00-1.09), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that patients with moderate to severe generalized MG benefited more from thymeetomy, with RRs of survival and pharmacologic re- mission increasing to 1.35 (1.24-1.49) and 2.68 (1.73-4.17), respectively. These results suggested that thymectomy might be an effective procedure in non-thymomatous MG patients. The patients with mod- erate to severe generalized MG might benefit more. Taking into account the poor methodological qual- ity of present studies, more well-designed prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still re- quired to reach uneouivocal conclusion.
关 键 词:myasthenia gravis THYMECTOMY systematic review
分 类 号:R746.1[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...