国有企业的产业拖累效应及其门槛特征  

The Effects of Industrial Cumbrance in State-owned Enterprises and the Threshold Characteristics

作　　者：郭丽丽[1] 李勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南财经大学经济学院

出　　处：《经济与管理研究》2015年第1期25-33,共9页Research on Economics and Management

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"双重二元结构约束下的我国金融资源配置研究"(13CJY130)

摘　　要：中国企业的二元结构("国有"一"民营")特征对企业的生产决策产生了重要影响,并进一步制约了技术模式的选择和产业结构变迁的路径。基于上述理解,国有企业存在产业拖累效应主要是因为:(1)国有企业因为产权安排的缺陷存在着生产效率和创新效率损失,从而阻碍产业结构变迁(第Ⅰ类产业拖累效应);(2)国有企业的低效率还通过滞后城市化、挤出公共服务等途经阻碍非国有企业的产业结构变迁(第Ⅱ类产业拖累效应)。不仅如此,由于国有企业的效率随着市场化水平的提高而提高,故不同的市场化水平下,所有制结构与产业结构变迁之间还存在着明显的门槛效应。本文基于1997—2009年的省际面板数据利用静态面板模型和面板门槛回归模型进行了实证分析,结果证实了这一猜想。The structure between state-owned enterprises and privates enterprises restricts the optimal choice of technology and the path of industrial change plays high impetus on the firm’s productive decision.According to the comprehension mentioned above,it is believed that the SOE’s industrial cumbrance exists.One reason is that the defects of SOE’s property rights give rise to the losses of productive and innovative efficiency,which drag the industrial change;the other is that the low efficiency of SOE blocks the industrial evolvement of non-SOE by under urbanization,ownership discrimination（financial constraints）and some other mechanisms.Besides,because the efficiency of SOE climbs up as the market environment improves,it shows threshold effects between ownership structure and industrial change.To testify the proposition,a substantial research is taken by static panel model and panel threshold model.

关 键 词：国有企业 产业拖累效应 市场化水平 产业结构合理化 

分 类 号：F271.1[经济管理—企业管理] F260[经济管理—国民经济]