《淮南子》“秦始皇”观评议  

Comment on Qin Shi Huang in Huai Nan Zi

作　　者：高旭[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]安徽理工大学,安徽淮南232001 [2]南开大学,天津300071

出　　处：《西安财经学院学报》2015年第1期92-98,共7页Journal of Xi’an University of Finance & Economics

基　　金：安徽省教育厅人文社会科学一般项目"<淮南子>与法家思想研究"(2011SK142);安徽省社科联项目"<淮南子>与其成书背景的互动研究"(B2012001)

摘　　要：《淮南子》多次论及"秦始皇",从社会经济、政治用人、现实战争及法治实践等方面,对其暴虐之政进行严厉批判。着眼于治术、治道及君道,《淮南子》从道、儒立场出发,深刻反思秦政之失,认为其根由在于秦始皇迷信法家的功利政治,并将其在实践上推向极端化,以致秦王朝缺失"民本"的正义性内涵,最终在纵欲残民、与民为仇中败亡。对秦始皇的暴政之失,《淮南子》试图让统治者深有借鉴,以此促使其在治国上民本为先、身国同治,延续清静无为、休养生息的汉初国策,推动西汉王朝实现"圣王"之治。The political practice of Qin Shi Huang was criticises in Huai Nan Zi for many times from social econmy ,the talent of chooseing and using ,mergers war and the rule of law practice .Based on Taoism and Confucianism point of view , H uai N an Zi reflects the disadvantages and limitations of Qin Shi Huang ’s political practice which includes the means of governing the country ,the wisdom of governing the country and leadership principle of the monarch .Huai Nan Zi thinks Qin Shi Huang despises the power of people and maintains the cruel rule abide by Legalism ’s utilitarian thought so that Qin dynasty quickly come to perish .In order to achieve Han dynasty’s prosperity , H uai N an Zi tries to urge the ruler of Han dynasty to draw and learn lessons of Qin Shi Huang .

关 键 词：《淮南子》 秦始皇 法家 道家 儒家 民本 

分 类 号：K233[历史地理—历史学]