贫困大学生心理健康测评比较研究——基于SCL-90和SRHMS测评法  

The Comparative Research on SRHMS and SCL-90 Applied in Impoverished Undergraduates' Mental Health Measurement

作　　者：刘阳[1] 

机构地区：[1]钦州学院教育学院,广西钦州535000

出　　处：《钦州学院学报》2014年第10期81-85,共5页Journal of Qinzhou University

基　　金：2011年钦州学院校级科研项目:贫困大学生心理危机干预的初步探讨(2011XJKYQN-05);2011年广西教育系统维护学校安全稳定工作立项研究课题B类一般立项项目:贫困大学生心理危机干预的初步探讨(桂教安稳(2011)26号)

摘　　要：选取广西地区贫困生279名。用SCL-90和SRHMS量表同时进行心理健康评定与比较分析。结果为贫困大学生除了躯体化因子外,其余各因子的得分均高于国内常规青年组,差别均有统计学意义(P<0.05);SCL-90高分组的SRHMS各因子得分明显低于SCL-90低分组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两个量表各因子评分存在明显负相关(P<0.01)。为此,SCL-90和SRHMS具有一定的内在一致性,测查结果显示广西钦州地区贫困大学生心理健康状况较差,应该重视对贫困生的心理疏导和帮助。After tested 279 impoverished undergraduates by SCL-90 and SRHMS concurrently, this paper compares the results of SCL-90 and SRHMS used in impoverished undergraduates. One result of SCL-90 is that the scores of impoverished college students were higher than that of the model of the youth in China, with significant differences except somatization of items, P〈0.05. The other results are that the impoverished undergraduates with fewer mental symptoms showed significantly higher health level in SRHMS and the scores of SCL-90 were negatively correlated with the scores of SRHMS. So, we make the Conclusion that the scores of SCL-90 and SRHMS in assessing impoverished undergraduates＇ mental health levels had higher correspondence.

关 键 词：症状自评量表 自测健康评定量表 贫困大学生 心理健康 SCL-90 

分 类 号：B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]