质疑与反思:牵连犯的处断原则  

Doubtness and Reflection: The Punishment Principle for Implicated Offenses

作　　者：石聚航[1] 朱炜[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西警察学院法律系,江西南昌330100

出　　处：《福建警察学院学报》2014年第5期44-49,共6页Journal of Fujian Police College

基　　金：2012年江西省社会科学"十二五"规划项目(12FX03)

摘　　要：寻找质疑牵连犯处断原则的新理由,应当结合我国刑法学的理论体系和刑法典的具体规定。牵连犯作为刑法学范畴,与罪数理论的判断标准以及其在罪数理论的体系安排上均存在不协调之处。况且从现行刑法规定与司法解释的规定上看,牵连犯的应用也屡屡受阻。刑法学界新近出现的一些观点,通过对牵连犯的概念进行有限的改造,试图维护牵连犯从一重处断的原则,亦在逻辑论证和结论证成上存在诸多破绽。牵连犯从一重处断原则实难在当下刑法学理论和刑法制度体系中寻找合适的地位。The new reason for doubtness toward the punishment principle for implicated offenses can be found in the theoretical system and the specific provisions of our criminal law .The implicated offense is definitely within criminal law , and it usually conflicts with the theory of crime number , either its judgment standard or its system ar-rangement .Besides , from the provisions of the current criminal law and its judicial interpretations , the application of implicated offenses also fails to go smoothly .Even though the concept of implicated offenses has been slightly re-formed in criminal law educational world , making an attempt to maintain its severe punishment principle , the impli-cated offenses are still not perfect in the logical argumentation .Therefore, it is a long way to go before the severe punishment principle for implicated offenses find its right position in the present theories and system of criminal law .

关 键 词：牵连犯 处断原则 从一重处断 

分 类 号：DF639[政治法律—刑法学]