检察机关刑事审判监督制度的困境与变革  

Difficulties in the Procuratorates' Criminal Trial Supervision System and Its Reform

作　　者：霍文良[1] 

机构地区：[1]华北电力大学法政系,河北保定071003

出　　处：《保定学院学报》2014年第6期43-47,共5页Journal of Baoding University

基　　金：河北省社会科学基金项目"民事司法权力运行机制的改革与实践--以河北法院为例"(HB13FX004);华北电力大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(13MS120)

摘　　要：刑事诉讼法明确规定了人民检察院的诉讼监督权,但规定过于原则,大多缺乏可操作性,因此当前的司法实践中检察机关对刑事审判活动的监督主要以刑事抗诉为主,但从实际效果来看,这种抗诉模式的监督对司法活动的影响不大、监督作用不明。应当明确刑事审判监督的目的和界限,完善监督保障机制。Criminal Procedural Law clearly defines the power to litigation supervision for the People ＇s Procuratorates, but the provisions are too general, mostly in lack of maneuverability. Therefore, in the current judicial practice the procuratorial supervision on the criminal trials mainly focuses on criminal protest, whereas as far as the actual effect is concerned, the supervision model by protest has little effect on criminal trials. We should be clear the purposes and limits of criminal trial supervision, perfecting supervision assurance mechanism.

关 键 词：刑事审判监督 抗诉 监督界限 监督目的 监督保障机制 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]