网络公共空间治理的法治原理  

Legal Rationale of the Governance of Public Cyber Space

作　　者：秦前红[1] 李少文[2] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,武汉430072 [2]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《现代法学》2014年第6期15-26,共12页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：网络公共空间能够形成、传递和表达公众的意志和利益,是政治过程的初步形态,反映了社会的自由化。法治应用于网络公共空间的治理,要求建立满足不同主体需求的秩序结构,同时保障民主价值和公民的自由权。它形成建设法治社会和控制国家权力的双重治理目标,也体现了网络治理的双重结构。软法之治和硬法之治是不同的工具,它们既明确了责任主体,也充分利用了服务商和公众的参与。作为两种效力实现模式,过程控制以依法行政为核心,司法控制则是法治终端,其成效不彰影响治理效果。国家针对公民信息自由的积极义务主要是信息公开和打击谣言,针对言论自由主要承担消极义务。当以国家义务之履行检视治理行为的合宪性。Public cyber space enables the formation, transmission and expression of the willingness and in- terest of general public, which can be regarded as the preliminary form of political process and demonstrates so- cial freedom. To apply rule of law to the governance of public cyber space, an order structure satisfying the need of different subjects shall be established to protect the value of democracy and freedom of citizens. It helps form the double governance goal in building a society based on rule of law and controlling state power, which is also the double structure of cyber space governance. Both the rule of soft law and hard law are useful instru- ments to clarify the objects of responsibility and involve both internet service providers and the public. As two different realization modes, process control centers on lawful administration, while judicial control is the last re- sort, the ineffectiveness of which directly impacts the result of governance. The positive obligation of the state to information freedom of the general public is information disclosure and rumor crackdown, while the state has passive obligation toward freedom of speech. The constitutionality review of the act of governance shall be in connection with the performance of state obligations.

关 键 词：网络公共空间 自由化 治理 法治社会 软法 

分 类 号：DF0-05[政治法律—法学理论]