高校学术纠纷的性质、类型及解决  

The Property and Type of Academic Dispute in Colleges and Universities and Its Solution

作　　者：洪萍[1] 颜三忠[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学政法学院,南昌330022

出　　处：《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》2014年第6期66-72,共7页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：江西省高校人文社科基金课题(09YB216)

摘　　要：伴随着我国高等教育的快速发展,高等教育领域的纠纷不断增加,以高校为被告的诉讼不断发生,其中不仅仅包括行政纠纷、民事纠纷,还出现了涉及学术领域的学术纠纷。这种纠纷发生在高校学术活动领域,以学术权力为内容,与学术主体利益紧密相关,包括高校与学生之间发生的学位授予纠纷、高校教师与学生之间论文评审纠纷、教师之间因违反学术规范引发的学术侵权纠纷,也有高校教师职称评审与高校发生的学术管理纠纷。高校学术纠纷既具有民事纠纷的特点,又有行政纠纷的特点,加之高校法律地位的特殊性、学术问题的高度专业性以及司法机关对相关学术专业知识的欠缺,传统的民事纠纷或行政纠纷解决办法不能正确、合理解决高校学术纠纷。高校学术纠纷的解决应该从规范学术权力、严格学术评价标准,完善学术纠纷申诉制度、仲裁制度入手。With the fast development of higher education in China, the higher education domain dispute increases unceasingly. The lawsuit with the university as defendant occurs very often, which not only includes administrative disputes and civil disputes, but also academic disputes emerged in the academic fields. This kind of academic dispute takes academic right as the content and is closely related to academic subject body’s benefits. It mainly includes the degree-conferring disputes between university and students, paper review dispute between university teachers and students, academic infringement disputes violating academic norms between teachers, teachers＇ professional titles and the academic management disputes etc.. University academic dispute has both the characteristics of civil disputes and administrative disputes. Due to the specificity of university law position, high specialty of academic issues and the lack of relevant academic knowledge of judiciary organizations, the traditional civil disputes and administrative disputes solution cannot correctly and reasonably solve this kind of disputes. The solution for them should begin from normalizing academic power, being strict with academic evaluation standard, and improving the appeal system and academic disputes arbitration system.

关 键 词：高校学术纠纷 学术权力 行政权力 制度设计 

分 类 号：G40-011.8[文化科学—教育学原理]