亚里士多德与海德格尔:一个存在论的比较研究  

Aristotle and Heidegger:A Comparative Study in Ontology

作　　者：聂敏里[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院

出　　处：《哲学研究》2015年第1期86-93,129,共8页Philosophical Research

基　　金："新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助"项目的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在《存在与时间》的导论部分,海德格尔通过批评性地诉诸亚里士多德的存在论思想,为自己的存在论策略的实施创造了前提。本文在深入分析海德格尔这些论述的基础上,对比亚里士多德的存在论立场,系统地揭示出海德格尔对亚里士多德存在论思想的关键性误读,表明正是由于忽略了亚里士多德基于存在的多种意义理论对存在的逻辑分析,海德格尔才有可能为存在意义的探寻开辟一条完全不同的现代道路,将传统的存在论导向他自己的特殊的生存论现象学上去。In the Introductory of Being and Time,by means of critically referring to Aristotle's ontological thoughts,Heidegger prepares the premises for his own task of ontological study.This paper,based on an analysis of Heidegger's accounts in question,points out his essential misunderstandings of Aristotle's ontological thoughts.And it also makes sense that it is because of missing Aristotle's logical analysis of Being from the doctrine of several meanings of Being that Heidegger is able to open a very different modern way to study the meaning of Being,and thus lead the traditional ontology into his distinct existentialist phenomenology.

关 键 词：存在 最高普遍性 同名异义 生存论现象学 

分 类 号：B516.54[哲学宗教—外国哲学]