非法证据排除规则典型案例分析——以J省D市司法实践为样本  

Exclusionary Rule in China:Cases, Analysis and Implementation

作　　者：郭旭[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《法学杂志》2015年第1期133-140,共8页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"非法证据排除规则在中国的实施问题研究"(项目批准号:11JJD820016)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：非法证据排除规则体现了我国《刑事诉讼法》"尊重与保障人权"的基本要求。J省D市司法机关在刑事诉讼过程中,结合案件情况和实践经验,充分发挥主观能动性,创造性地探索了实施非法证据排除规则的可行性路径:运用多种方式联合证明取证合法,以庭前会议作为非法证据调查程序的制度支撑,并通过印证规则判断证据真伪及证明力大小。刑讯行为之界定需要结合"痛苦规则"进行个案分析,"刑讯"是因"逼供"是果,并非所有刑讯行为均会导致排除有罪供述的后果。The exclusionary rule is the most important content of the principle of ＂respecting and safeguarding human rights＂ in China＇ s Criminal Procedure law. The judicial organs in D city, J province, based on the cases and the judicial experience, have engaged in creating a new and concrete method to implement the exclusionary rule： hosting the pre -trial meeting as the supporting mechanism, using multiple other evidences to prove the admissibility of the evidence in doubt, and confirming the validity and probative force. Meanwhile, more attentions shall be paid to the problems such as the confirmation of extorting a confession by torture and whether using the torture would definitely suppress the confession.

关 键 词：非法证据排除规则 案例 经验 探讨 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]