自由心证制度在中国适用的合理性与可行性  

On rationality and feasibility of free evaluation of evidence

作　　者：乐乐[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学政治学与公共管理学院,上海市201620

出　　处：《辽宁科技大学学报》2014年第6期642-646,共5页Journal of University of Science and Technology Liaoning

摘　　要：西方国家诉讼中的证据制度在经过神示证据制度、法定证据制度后,发展为自由心证制度并沿用至今。本文从刑事诉讼角度出发,结合2012年刑事诉讼法的修订与其司法解释的出台,通过分析中国刑事诉讼证据制度适用过程中的局限性及其所产生的负面影响,探讨自由心证制度在中国刑事诉讼法中适用的合理性和可行性。After the God＇ s decision and the legal evidence, the evidence system of litigation m the westerncountries has been developing to free evaluation of evidence. From the perspective of criminal procedure andcombining with the criminal procedure law revised in 2012 and its judicial interpretation, the rationality andfeasibility of the appliance of free evaluation of evidence in the criminal procedure law in our country are in-vestigated through the analysis of the limitations in criminal litigation evidence system and its negative effects.

关 键 词：证据制度 自由心证 刑事诉讼法 

分 类 号：D915.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]