检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张守鹏[1]
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2015年第2期15-16,共2页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
摘 要:目的:对比分析腹腔镜与开放行肾部分切除术的疗效。方法:将62例患者根据手术方法的不同分为2组,分别行腹腔镜肾部分切除术和开放肾部分切除术治疗。观察2组患者的术中出血量、住院时间、手术时间等指标。结果:2组在术中出血量、住院时间、手术时间方面相比,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),腹腔镜肾部分切除术组优于开放肾部分切除术组。结论:与开放肾部分切除术相比,腹腔镜肾部分切除术具有更少的出血量、更短的手术时间和更短的住院时间。Objective:To comparative analyze of laparoscopic and open renal partial efficacy of resection .Methods:62 patients were divided according to different operation methods into two groups , respectively , laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrec-tomy in the treatment of .Observed two groups of patients the bleeding volume , operation time , hospitalization time .Results:The two groups in the amount of bleeding , hospitalization time, operation time is compared, the difference was statistically significant (p<0. 05) , laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group wasbetter than the open partial nephrectomy group .Conclusion:Compared with open partial nephrectomy , laparoscopic partial nephrectomy hospitalization should have less bleeding , shorter operation time and less .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145