临床护理路径在小儿支原体肺炎教学中的应用  

Clinical nursing path teaching application in teaching children with mycoplasma pneumonia

作　　者：干丽君[1] 

机构地区：[1]九江学院护理学院,332000

出　　处：《中华医学教育探索杂志》2014年第10期1033-1035,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research

摘　　要：目的探讨临床护理路径在小儿支原体肺炎中的应用及其效果。方法选择我院2011级高职护理专业2个班学生93人为研究对象，一个班46人设为实验组，另一个班47人设为对照组。对照组采用传统教学，实验组采用临床护理路径教学。教学结束后，对两组护生进行闭卷考试和问卷调查以评价教学效果。采用SPSS13．0软件进行统计分析，计数资料采用χ^2检验，计量资料采用t检验，检验水准α=0．05。结果实验组护生理论考试成绩（85．26±3．57）分明显高于对照组（76．39±4．16）分，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P=0.02）。问卷调查显示，实验组学生对问卷项目中有助于提高学习自主性、有助于提高评判性思维能力、促进对疾病内容的掌握作出肯定评价的人数多于对照组，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论应用临床护理路径可提高教学效果。Objective To explore the clinical nursing path teaching method application in children with myeoplasma pneumonia and its effect. Methods 93 higher vocational nursing students of two classes of Grade 2011 were chosen as the subjects, one class as the experimental group（46）, and the other class as the control group（47）. The traditional teaching method was used in the control group, while method of clinical nursing path was used in the experimental group. Two groups of nursing students were given closed book exams and questionnaires to evaluate teaching effectiveness of the two groups. SPSS 13.0 was used for statistical analysis, count data using χ^2 test, measurement data using t-test, test level α=0.05. Results The experimental group students＇ test scores were significantly higher than the control group（85.26±3.57）vs. （76.39±4.16）, and the difference was statistically significant P=-0.02. The survey showed that there were more students in the experimental group than in the control group who made a positive comment on the questionnaire＇s role in helping improve students＇ learning autonomy, their critical thinking ability, and promote their grasp of the content of the disease. Conclusion Clinical nursing path teaching method as a new kind of teaching method, can improve the teaching effect.

关 键 词：临床护理路径 教学法 支原体肺炎 

分 类 号：R183.3[医药卫生—流行病学]