哪类高校教师易患职业倦怠:10年研究的元分析  

The Demographic Characteristics of the Teachers' Job Burnout in College:A Meta-analysis of Relevant Empirical Researches form 2003 to 2013

作　　者：徐长江[1] 解晓龙[1] 莫世亮[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江师范大学教师教育学院,浙江金华321004 [2]浙江师范大学人文学院,浙江金华321004

出　　处：《教师教育研究》2015年第1期79-87,共9页Teacher Education Research

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(11YJA880124)

摘　　要：本文运用元分析方法深入了解我国高校教师职业倦怠的真实状况。通过文献查阅收集44项使用包含"情绪耗竭"、"去人性化"和"低成就感"三因素测评工具的关于高校教师职业倦怠的研究,样本总量为14467人,根据人口学特征(性别、年龄、婚姻、岗位和职称等5个因素)分组,进行元分析处理。结果显示,人口学变量对高校教师职业倦怠有一定影响,表现在性别、年龄和职称三个方面,平均效应量分别为0.19、0.46和0.20,达到中效应水平;而婚姻状况和岗位类型影响不大,平均效应量分别是0.06和0.02,为小效应。高校教师职业倦怠群体内差异不受研究类型影响,但研究工具造成的差异值得关注。The method of meta-analysis was utilized to analyze the real demographic characteristics of the Teachers＇ Job Burnout in College. Forty-four cases pertaining to the College Teachers＇ Job Burnout were used, and 14467 teachers were surveyed. A meta-analysis was conducted on these articles in which that ＂Emotional exhaustion, Depersonalization and Diminished personal accomplishment＂ three dimensions of assessment tools was used. The study found that demographic variables have a certain influence on the University Teachers＇ Burnout performance in three aspects of Gender, Age and Professional Titles, the average effect sizes were 0. 19,0. 46 and 0. 20, for the medium effect; Marriage and Job Category, the average effect size of 0. 06 and 0. 02, for the small effect. Teacher burnout is not influenced by the type of research, but the differences caused research tool worthy of attention.

关 键 词：职业倦怠 高校教师 元分析 人口学特征 

分 类 号：G443[哲学宗教—心理学]