检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室,成都博士研究生610031
出 处:《城市轨道交通研究》2015年第1期32-34,共3页Urban Mass Transit
基 金:"十二五"国家科技支撑项目(2011BAG10B01;2011BAG05B04-A01);国家973计划项目(2011CB711106)
摘 要:利用车辆动力学仿真试验的分析方法,运用SIMPACK软件分别对三车四转向架的铰接式列车和三车六转向架的传统列车建立非线性动力学仿真模型,得到两种不同连接方式的列车在相同的运行环境下以不同速度运行时的动力学性能参数。结果表明,与传统连接方式的列车比较,在相同的运行环境下,铰接式列车在平直轨道上的动力学性能明显优于传统式列车,而在小曲线半径的轨道上,铰接式列车的动力学性能不具有优势。By using the analysis method of vehicle dynamics simulation and SIMPACK software, a three-car-articulated train with four bogies, and a three-car traditional train with six bogies are simulated, the non-linear dynamic models are estab- lished respectively. In this way, the dynamic performance parameters of two different trains are obtained when they run at different speeds in the same operating environment based on SIMPACK are obtained. The results show that, compared with the traditional train, the dynamics performance of the articulated train on a straight track is significantly better, however, on the track with small curve radius, the articulated train has no advantages in the same operating environment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.131.95.159