民国政治与城市规划的地方互动:南京“中央政治区”选址的变更进程  

Local Interaction between City Planning and Politics:Study on the Transformation of Nanjing Central Political Area

作　　者：董佳[1] 刘素林[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学马克思主义学院,北京100872 [2]山西大学晋商研究所,山西太原030006

出　　处：《中国历史地理论丛》2014年第4期149-158,共10页Journal of Chinese Historical Geography

基　　金：2011年度国家社科基金青年项目"国家权利视阈下民国首都南京的营造政治与现代想象;1927-1937"(项目编号:11CZS025)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：1929年底《首都计划》制定出台后,原本在《首都计划》中已有定论的"中央政治区"选址问题,却因政治因素影响而重生变数。从"中央政治区"最终地点和设计方案的产生经过看,城市设计并不以技术性、艺术性、法制性和民主性等原则为据,而是以实力较量和权谋运用为依归,制定规划过程中"法治"的背后其实仍是操纵权力下的"人治",成为国民党统一中国后革命政权内部纷争剧变的一个缩影。事实说明,国民政府的城市现代化努力,其实并不仅是技术层面的革新,同时也是封建时代加强统治和打击异己这一古老政治传统的现代延续而已。The plan of capital was constituted in the end of 1929. The location problem for Central Political Area was solved in that plan. However, it was influenced by political factors. By analyzing the decision--making process for final location and design plan of Central Political Area, we could un- derstand deeply the urban planning was based on the trial of power and the use of trickery, rather than principle of technical, artistic, legal and democratic. The most important factor for making city plan was not the rule of law, but the manipulation of power, and thus become a heaval in KMT regime. It had been proved that the nationalist government＇ forts not only innovated the city construction technically, but also inherited of strengthening rule and cracked clown on dissidents. miniature of the strife up- s urban modernization ef- the old political tradition.

关 键 词：民国政治 城市规划 “中央政治区”选址 “中央政治区”规划 

分 类 号：K878.2[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]