高度近视眼睫状沟间距的差异性及其与角膜水平直径的相互关系  

Discrepancy of sulcus-to-sulcus diameter and its relationship with white-to-white diameter in high myopic eyes

作　　者：张静[1] 罗汇慧[1] 吴君舒[1] 余克明[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学中山眼科中心眼科学国家重点实验室,广州510060

出　　处：《中华实验眼科杂志》2014年第12期1102-1106,共5页Chinese Journal Of Experimental Ophthalmology

摘　　要：背景 水平睫状沟间距（STS）和角膜水平直径是选择可植入接触镜（ICL）型号大小的重要参考指标,尺寸和型号不合适的ICL可引起术后多种并发症.既往已有较多关于正常眼的相关研究,但高度近视眼的相关测量结果鲜有报道. 目的 探讨高度近视眼不同径线STS的差异性,研究不同测量仪器获得的水平STS与角膜水平直径的差异及其相互关系.方法 于2013年4-6月收集中山大学中山眼科中心拟行ICL植入术的高度近视眼患者26例48眼,平均球镜值为（-12.93±3.87）D,平均散光度为（-1.37±1.02）D.应用超声生物显微镜（UBM）测量受检眼45°、90°、135°、180°4个不同径线的STS,使用OrbscanⅡz角膜地形图和IOLMaster测量受检眼的角膜水平直径,不同径线间STS的总体差异比较采用单因素方差分析,两两比较采用SNK-q检验.采用Bland-Altman一致性检验法分析UBM测得的水平方向STS与OrbscanⅡz或IOLMaster测得的角膜水平直径的一致性. 结果 UBM测得的45°、90°、135°、180°径线方向上STS平均值分别为（12.06±0.50）、（12.27±0.50）、（12.03±0.46）和（11.84±0.47） mm.除45°径线与135°径线的STS之间差异无统计学意义（P=0.817）外,45°与90°、45°与180°、90°与135°、90°与180°、135°与180°径线STS之间的差异均有统计学意义（P=0.036、0.026、0.020、0.000、0.045）.OrbscanⅡz测得角膜水平直径为（11.56±0.40） mm,与180°水平径线的STS差异有统计学意义（t=-4.384,P=0.000）,Bland-Altman一致性分析显示两者结果一致性欠佳,95％可信区间（CI）为-0.57 ～ 1.12 mm.IOLMaster测得角膜水平直径为（11.98±0.41）mm,与180°水平径线的STS差异有统计学意义（t=2.368,P=0.000）,Bland-Altman一致性分析显示两者结果一致性欠佳,95％ CI为-0.96～0.67 mm.IOLMaster比ObrscanⅡz测得的角膜水平直径长,且差异有统计学意义（P=0.020）,两种仪器测量Bland-Altman一致性分析显示9Background Horizontal sulcus-to-sulcus （STS） and white-to-white diameter are important parameters for designing the proper size of collamer implantable contact lens （ICL）.Inappropriate size of ICL may induce the complications postoperatively.Several previous studies compare horizontal STS and white-to-white diameter in normal eyes have been reported,but seldom in high myopic eyes.Objective This study was to investigate the discrepancy of STS diameters in 4 axes and analyze the relationship between horizontal STS diameter and white-towhite diameter in high myopia eyes.Methods The STS diameters in 4 axes （45,90,135 and 180 degrees） and the white-to-white diameters were measured in 48 eyes of 26 high myopia patients using the 50 MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy （UBM）,the Orbscan-Ⅱ topography system,and the IOL Master,respectively.The mean spherical was （-12.93±3.87） diopters （D） （-8 to-20 D）.Statistical evaluation was performed using the one-way ANOVA for comparison of measurement.The agreement of three devices was assessed using the Bland and Altman method.Results The mean STS diameter at 45,90,135 and 180 degrees was （12.06±0.50） mm,（12.27±0.50）mm,（12.03±0.46） mm and （11.84±0.47）mm,respectively.The 90 degree STS was significantly larger than other STS diameters （all at P＜0.05）.The 180 degrees STS was significantly shorter than other STS diameters （all at P＜0.05）.However,there was no significant difference between 45 degree STS and 135 degree STS （P=0.817）.The mean WTW was （11.56±0.40） mm with Orbscan Ⅱ z topography system and （11.98±0.41） mm with IOLMaster.The WTW measured with Orbscan Ⅱ z was significantly shorter than the 180 degrees STS （t =-4.384,P =0.000）.The WTW measured with IOLMaster was significantly larger than the 180 degrees STS （t =2.368,P =0.000）.Bland-Altman analysis showed not very well agreement for measurements of WTW,STS between Orbscan Ⅱz and UBM,IOLMaster and UBM,Orbscan Ⅱ z and IOLMaster,the width of 95�

关 键 词：睫状沟间距 角膜水平直径 超声生物显微镜 OrbscanⅡz IOLMASTER 近视 

分 类 号：R778.11[医药卫生—眼科]