检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶盛威[1]
出 处:《肿瘤学杂志》2015年第1期1-4,共4页Journal of Chinese Oncology
摘 要:对uT1期直肠癌,NCCN指南和卫生部门的规范都推荐应用经肛门切除术治疗,但是文献表明其疗效存在争议。文章综述了经肛门切除术的发展、适应证以及长期疗效,并回顾了经肛门切除术后存在高危因素时的及时补救手术和复发后的挽救手术效果。所有这些结果表明:经肛门切除术适用于某些对经腹部大手术有禁忌证的患者,或者适用于某些对保留肛门意愿极其强烈而不愿做大手术的患者,但是他们必须明白,经肛门切除术治疗直肠癌的疗效低于常规的根治性手术,包括增加癌症相关的死亡风险。Transanal exsicion(TAE) for uT1 rectal cancer is recommended on NCCN guideline and Chinese healthy administration norm,but it is still a controversy on prognosis in the literatures. The progress,indication, and long-term oncologic results of TAE are reviewed, and salvage surgery for patients with high risk factors and local recurrence after TAE are discussed. All results show that:TAE should be restricted to patients with medical contraindications to major abdominal surgery or with strong desire to anal sparing. But they should know that TAE offers significantly inferior oneologic results, including a greater risk of cancer-related death.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222