检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨剑珍[1,2] 梁以明[1,2] 徐学良[1,2] 刘成霞[1,2]
机构地区:[1]广东省口腔医院 [2]南方医科大学附属口腔医院番禺分院牙体牙髓病科,广东广州511400
出 处:《广东牙病防治》2014年第12期628-631,共4页Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment
摘 要:目的比较超声锉和常规K锉清除单根管离体牙内Vitapex糊剂的效果。方法收集单根管离体牙32颗,常规开髓、根备后,封入Vitapex糊剂,拍术前X线片,暂封后置于人工唾液中2周。离体牙随机分为超声1 min组、超声2 min组、超声3 min组和对照的常规K锉组,每组8颗。超声1 min组:超声锉荡洗根管1 min配合冲洗;超声2 min组:超声锉荡洗根管2 min配合冲洗;超声3 min组:超声锉荡洗根管3 min配合冲洗;常规K锉组:K锉配合冲洗去除根管内Vitapex糊剂。拍术后X线片。使用Image-J图像分析软件分析Vitapex糊剂的残留量,计算清除率。结果 4组均无法完全清除根管内的Vitapex糊剂,超声2 min组、超声3 min组较超声1 min组和常规K锉组的Vitapex糊剂残留量少,清除效果更好,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论超声锉清除单根管离体牙内Vitapex糊剂效果优于常规K锉,超声锉荡洗根管2 min和3 min能有效地清除根管内的Vitapex糊剂。Objective This study aimed to evaluate the amount of remaining Vitapex paste in root canals after mechanical removal by two techniques quantitatively. Methods Thirty-two extracted single-rooted teeth were collected and used for all four groups:test group A, B, C and control group D, 8 for each group. After pulp exposing,the samples were firstly prepared by ProTaper rotary instruments, and then filled with Vitapex paste, followed by taking X-ray. After filled temporarily, The tooth were kept in the artificial saliva for 2 weeks. The removal procedure began with Ultrasonic file ( group A, B and C) and K file (group D) , group A: ultrasonic irrigation for 1 minute and syringe irrigation; group B: ultrasonic irrigation for 2 minutes and syringe irrigation ; anti group C : ultrasonic irrigation for 3 minutes and syringe lrrigation; group D( control group) : remove the Vitapex paste with K file and syringe irrigation. The tooth were then taken X-ray. The ratio of Vitapex paste coated surface area was calc, ulated by a image analysis software called hnage-J. The data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA using post-hoc Tukey test. Results It showed that none of the two techniques were able to remove all Vitapex paste, group A and group B have better removal effects than group C and group D, and significant difference was found between group A, group B and group C, group D ( α = 0.05 ). Conclusion The ultrasonic techniques were more effective in removing intracanal medicaments than the K file when the activation time is 2 min and 3 min.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43