买卖合同风险负担规则的规范分析——“交付主义”说的质疑  

Analysis of Business Contract Risk Burden Rules——The Question of The Principle of Delivery

作　　者：黎桦[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北经济学院地方法制研究中心,湖北武汉430205

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2015年第1期77-83,共7页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：作者主持的教育部人文社会科学研究2011年一般项目"审计实务中企业合同效力控制研究--以防范国有资产流失为考察点"的阶段性成果(项目编号11YJA820034)

摘　　要：在买卖合同的风险负担规则上,"交付主义"被学界认为具有超出"所有权主义"的诸多优点,是未来合同法的发展趋势。但根据对我国有关买卖合同风险负担规则的规范分析,"交付主义"难以涵盖我国立法的总体规则体系,学界对"交付主义"存在盲从和崇拜,具有多处谬误。应当对现行买卖合同风险负担规则进行简练和精准的新界定,即除非合同当事人另有约定,在标的物为不动产时,依"交付主义";标的物为动产时,依"所有权主义";当事人存在过错时,依"过错主义"。In the rules of risk passage under sales contract, the principle of delivery is seen by academic circles having many advantages comparing with the principle of ownership, which is the future developing trend of the contract law. But according to the analysis of China＇ s relevant business contract risk passage rules, it is diffi- cult to cover the general rules regime of legislation in China. We shall redefine the current business contract risk passage rules concisely and accurately. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties of the contracts, the princi- ple of delivery should apply when the subject matter is the real estate, and the principle of ownership shall be used when the subject matter is the personal property, and the fault doctrine shall apply when one party has fault.

关 键 词：买卖合同 风险负担规则 交付主义 所有权主义 过错主义 

分 类 号：D923.9[政治法律—民商法学]