检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]齐齐哈尔市第一医院口腔科,黑龙江齐齐哈尔161005
出 处:《中国美容医学》2014年第24期2081-2083,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:分析一次性根管治疗对牙髓坏死的老年人磨牙的术后反应及疗效,评价老年患者行一次性根管治疗的可行性。方法:选取60~70岁急、慢性根尖周炎和牙髓坏死的老年人120例(磨牙140颗),随机分成两组,分别采用一次性根管治疗和多次性根管治疗,根管预备均采用ProTaper镍钛锉,多次性疗程间氢氧化钙根管封药,比较两组根管治疗后的反应及疗效。结果:术后1周疼痛率和术后1年治愈率两组之间均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:在严格选择适应证的条件下对老年人根管感染的磨牙行一次性根管治疗是可行的。Objective The objective is to observe and analyze the postoperation reaction and therapeutic effects of single- visit therapy for aged people's molar root canal infection and to evaluate its feasibility in clinical practice. Methods 140 molar teeth from 120 persons of 60- 70 years old with pulp necrosis,acute/chronic apical periodontitis were randomly divided into two groups:study group treated with root canal therapy in single- visit and control group with multiple root canal therapies. ProTaper was adopted in both the two preparations. Besides,the multiple therapies adopted calcium hydroxide as intracranial medication. The two groups' therapies after treatment were evaluated. Results No obvious difference was found between the study and control groups in either incidence of pain after a week or recovery rate after a year(P〉0.05). Conclusion Single- visit root canal therapy for aged people's molar infection is feasible under the circumstances of strict selection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28