行政检察：解决行政争议的第三条道路  

Administrative Supervision:A Third Way to Solve Administrative Disputes

作　　者：解志勇[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学 [2]法治政府协同创新中心

出　　处：《中国法学》2015年第1期48-66,共19页China Legal Science

基　　金：作者主持的国家社科基金重点课题“《行政诉讼法》修改研究”(课题编号12AFX005)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：当前解决行政争议的主要法律途径是行政诉讼和行政复议,但实践效果差强人意,两种方式还存在若干难以弥补的缺陷。如果把对西方制度借鉴的目光转向中国本土法律资源,审视现行宪法框架下的制度设计,会发现行政检察具有弥补诉讼和复议缺憾的潜力,其所具有的主动性、弱对抗性、威慑性以及公共利益导向等制度优势,可以以更高效、更容易被各方接受的方式解决行政争议。因此,建议将其作为解决行政争议的第三条道路。At present, administrative litigationand administrative reconsideration are two major legal approaches to solve administrative disputes, but these two approaches have unsurmountable shortages. After examining several other existing systems, the system of proseeutorial supervision over executive branch should be considered as an effective approach to achieve this goal. Practices in recent years show that it is not only a system for power restriction, but also an effective approach for administrative disputes resolution. This article thus suggests that administrative supervision should be adopted as ~i third legal approach to solve administrative disputes.

关 键 词：行政检察 行政争议 检察建议 行政诉讼 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]