机构地区:[1]南方医科大学南方医院肿瘤科,广东广州510515 [2]阜阳市第五人民医院内科,安徽阜阳236000 [3]温州医科大学第一临床医学院,浙江温州325000
出 处:《现代肿瘤医学》2015年第4期483-490,共8页Journal of Modern Oncology
基 金:广东省科技项目(编号:2012B031800394);广东省自然科学基金项目(编号:S2011010003881)
摘 要:目的:利用Meta分析比较表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI)与单药二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效。方法:在Pub Med、EMBASE、中国生物医学文献、CNKI、维普、万方等数据库中检索1965年1月至2014年4月发表的相关文献。制定纳入标准对文献进行筛选以保证纳入研究的同质性。由2名评价者独立评价所纳入研究的质量,提取资料并交叉核对。符合标准的研究采用Stata 12.0软件进行Meta分析。以客观缓解率(ORR)选择比值比(OR)作为效应尺度指标,计算无进展生存时间(PFS)和总生存时间(OS)风险比(HR),同时计算95%可信区间(CI)。结果:17个随机对照实验符合全部纳入标准,含4514例NSCLC患者。Meta分析显示,接受靶向治疗和化疗组的PFS(HR 0.94,95%CI=0.79-1.12,P=0.511)、OS(HR 0.98,95%CI=0.89-1.08,P=0.699)无显著统计学差异。在EGFR基因状态未知人群中,靶向治疗ORR好于化疗(OR 1.53,95%CI=1.02-2.31,P=0.040)。同时对于EGFR基因状态的野生人群,靶向治疗OS好于化疗(HR 0.75,95%CI=0.57-0.99,P=0.044)。结论:对于EGFR基因状态未知人群,靶向治疗和化疗组的PFS、OS无显著统计学差异,而靶向治疗缓解率ORR好于化疗。Objective: To use Meta - analysis to compare the clinical efficacy between epidermal growth factor re- ceptor inhibitors( EGFR - TKI) and second - line chemotherapy with single drug for advanced non - small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Methods : Relevant literatures were searched through PubMed, Embase, CBMdise, CNKI, Wanfang and WP databases from January 1965 to April 2014. The implement standards for literature selection were used to en- sure the homogeneity of research. Two reviewers evaluated independently the quality of the included studies and then extracted the data. We performed Meta - analysis by Stata 12.0 software. Odds ratios (ORs) as efficacy index was chosen by objective response rate(ORR), and hazard ratios(HRs) were calculated by progression- free survival (PFS) and overall survival(OS) times. The 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) was calculated simultaneously. Results : Seventeen randomized controlled trials were included for a total of 4514 patients with NSCLC. This Meta- analysisshowed no statistical significance in PFS ( HR 0.94,95 % CI = 0.79 - 1.12, P = 0.511 ) and OS ( HR 0.98,95 % CI = 0.89 - 1.08, P = 0.699) for patients who received EGFR - TKI compared with patients who received chemotherapy. However,EGFR-TKI showed superior to chemotherapy significantly in ORR(OR 1.53,95% CI = 1.02 -2.31 ,P = 0. 040) for patients with unknown - type EGFR tumors. Similarly, there was also a significant benefit for EGFR -TKI in OS ( HR 0.75,95 % CI = 0.57 - 0.99, P = 0. 044 ) for patients with wild - type EGFR tumors. Conclusion: For pa- tients with unknown -type EGFR tumors, it showed no profound significant differences in efficacy between EGFR - TKI and chemotherapy in both PFS and OS,whereas a statistical significance can be achieved in ORR,which showed that EGFR - TKI was superior to single chemotherapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...