民事检察建议的分类重构与原理探寻——以二元化权能结构为背景  

Re-Classification and Theoretical Study of the Civil Prosecutorial Suggestions

作　　者：韩静茹[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第1期131-136,共6页Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：依循民事检察权的二元化权能结构,可以将规范和实践领域形态多样的民事检察建议划分为以执法监督为职能的公权制约型检察建议和以守法监督为职能的社会治理型检察建议两大类,前者由再审检察建议、对审判人员违法行为的检察建议、执行监督检察建议组成,后者由督促起诉、申诉中的和解检察建议、执行协助检察建议组成。通过对这六种两类检察建议制度的生发原因、运行现状和主要问题进行梳理,能够提炼出各类检察建议的共性特征和运行原理:其中公权制约型检察建议的构建和运行应当遵循合法性和约束力原则、内部制约机制优先原则、比例原则和谦抑性原则;社会治理型检察建议的构建和运行需要遵循有限性原则、防止角色异化原则、公民自治和社会自治优先原则、合法性与规范性原则。Based on dualistic powers and function structure ,the civil prosecutorial suggestions can be divided in‐to two types：one is aimed at power check and balance ,which include retrial prosecutorial suggestion ,judge‐supervision prosecutorial suggestion and enforcement supervision prosecutorial suggestion ;the other is aimed at social governance ,w hich include urging related organs to file civil cases ,reconciliation prosecutorial sugges‐tion ,enforcement assistance prosecutorial suggestion .Through systematic study of the causes ,practice situa‐tion and primary issues of the six institutions ,the common features and fundamental theories of the civil prose‐cutorial suggestions can be extracted .Specifically ,check and balance prosecutorial suggestions should follow the principle of legality , proportionality and modest restraint ;social governance prosecutorial suggestions should follow the principle of limitation ,legality ,citizen and social autonomy priority .

关 键 词：民事检察建议 公权制约型检察建议 社会治理型检察建议 类型化 运行原理 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]