论我国第三人撤销之诉制度之不足及其完善——以民事判决的预决效力为视角  

On the Improvement of the System of the Suit of the Third Party Discharging the Judgment from the Perspective of Pre-decision of Civil Judgment

作　　者：谭庆德[1] 王美艳[1] 谭新宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]青岛大学法学院,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《东方论坛（青岛大学学报）》2015年第1期94-99,共6页Eastern Forum（JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY）

摘　　要：新《民事诉讼法》第56条第三款增加了民事诉讼第三人的一种权利救济方式——第三人撤销之诉,旨在进一步对第三人的权利进行保障。但由于只有一条简单的法律规定,没有具体的程序与配套制度,对于案件依何种审理程序进行审理问题、原裁判文书是否中止执行、它与案外人申请再审的重合关系如何协调等问题均未提及,这不仅令法官无法操作、也让律师实务界感到困惑,这一规定在实际审判工作中难以达到立法者预期的效果。同时考虑到第三人撤销之诉对已决判决的既判力的冲击与影响,必须慎重建构第三人撤销之诉制度的审理程序与适用条件。To Article 56, Section 3 of the New Civil Procedural Law is added the system of the third party discharging the judgment in order to protect the right of the third party. However, for lack of supporting systems, the simple legislation fails to consider court proceedings, the suspended execution of the original written judgment, the coordination of this regulation and ／ the system of outsiders＇ application for retrial so that the regulation cannOt achieve the desired effect. Meanwhile, considering the impact and effect of the third party＇s discharging the judgment on the concluded verdict, we must carefully establish the proceedings and applicable conditions of the system of the third party＇s application.

关 键 词：第三人撤销之诉 判决的预决效力 原告适格 审理程序 

分 类 号：D925.11[政治法律—诉讼法学]