“无”鲁迅的“竹内鲁迅”  

The Lu Xun in “Takeuti Lu Xun” is “Empty”

作　　者：韩琛[1] 

机构地区：[1]青岛大学文学院,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第1期118-121,共4页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"中国现代文学的周边视野"(项目编号:13YJA751015)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：通过先行否定《呐喊》、《彷徨》、仙台经验、启蒙者、先觉者等现实鲁迅像,竹内好以《野草》、S会馆时期、文学者、非先觉者等为回心之轴,塑造了一个本质为"无"的绝对"文学者鲁迅"。但是,试图一次性解决所有问题的终极目的论,使"竹内鲁迅"陷入了一种玄学式的同义反复逻辑,以至于以否定鲁迅来成就"竹内鲁迅",以无限否定至无来证明"无"。"竹内鲁迅"的形式先于内容、语言先于事实、目的先于历史,不过是以竹内好为代表的"二战"期间的日本知识人,表达其无法克服的历史困境和思想危机的媒介。"竹内鲁迅"其实"无"鲁迅。By denying the realistic images of Lu Xun such as ＂Outcry and Hesitation＂, experience of Sendai, enlightener and illuminati, Takeuti Yosimi with ＂Wild Grass＂, during the period of S Guild Hall, litterateur and non - illuminati as the axis of ＂Conversion＂, shaped an absolute ＂litterateur Lu Xun＂ that the nature is ＂empty＂. However, the ultimate teleology that tries to solve all the problems at a time makes ＂Takeuti Lu Xun＂ fall into a kind of metaphysics tautology logic. So it makes ＂Lu Xun＂ through denying Lu Xun and proves ＂empty＂ with infinite negation to empty. The fact that the content, language and purpose of ＂Takeuti Lu Xun＂ are prior to form, reality and discussion is only the ＂method＂ or ＂medium＂ that Japanese ＂Showa era intellectuals＂, such as Takeuti Yosimi, express their insurmountable historical dilemma. The Lu Xun in ＂Takeuti Lu Xun＂ is actually ＂empty＂ .

关 键 词：竹内鲁迅 无 回心 《野草》 文学者鲁迅 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学] I210