检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]莆田学院基础医学部公共卫生教研室 [2]莆田学院临床医学院 [3]莆田市第一医院,福建莆田351100
出 处:《辽宁医学院学报》2015年第1期62-64,共3页Journal of Liaoning Medical University (LNMU) Bimonthly
摘 要:目的考评安全感量表(SQ)应用于莆田市老年人安全感状况的信度和效度。方法应用安全感量表(SQ)和自我接纳问卷(SAQ)对586例莆田市老年人进行测试。结果安全感量表评价老年人安全感的2周重测信度为0.756(P<0.001),分半信度为0.771,Cronbach'sα系数为0.805;量表2个维度的集合效度和区分效度试验成功率均为100%;因子分析提取4个公因子,累积解释变异量54.384%,与理论构想基本相符;量表总分与自我接纳问卷总分相关系数r=0.712(P<0.001)。结论安全感量表具有较好的信度和效度,适合用于莆田市老年人安全感的测量。Objective To examine the reliability and validity of Security Questionnaire( SQ) in evaluating sense of security of Putian elderly population. Methods A total of 586 Putian elderly people were investigated with Security Questionnaire( SQ) and Self Acceptance Questionnaire( SAQ). Results The retest reliability of SQ for evaluating the elderly population's security condition during 2 weeks was 0. 756( P〈0. 001). The split- half reliability was 0. 771 and Cronbach's α- coefficient was 0. 805. The success rates of tests on collection validity and differentiate validity of the two dimensions were both 100%. Through factor analysis,we got four common factors,and cumulative explained variance was 54. 384,which was consistent with theoretical construct of the scale. The correlation coefficient of the total scores of SQ and SAQ was 0. 712( P〈0. 001). Conclusion SQ has relatively high reliability and validity,thus is suitable for evaluating the security condition of Putian elderly population.
分 类 号:R161.7[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222