“元语用学”与语用学——兼评雅阁·梅伊的“元语用学理论”  

Metapragmatics and Pragmatics: On Jacob Mey's Metapragmatics

作　　者：代树兰[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏理工学院,江苏常州213001

出　　处：《阜阳师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2014年第6期9-13,共5页Journal of Fuyang Normal University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"多模态话语研究--电视访谈的多模态话语特征"(11YJA740012);江苏省教育科学"十二五"规划重点专项课题"语言教学的多模态化与中学英语多模态读写能力的调查研究"(E-b/2013/016)

摘　　要：所谓的元语用学是对语用学研究自身的考察、审视和反思,是对语用学研究中方法论和理论体系建构问题的思考。在语用学发展日趋成熟的过程中,对其理论基础、研究对象、语用原则及其解释力等进行反思、审视,有利于语用学的健康发展。然而,从科学分类的角度看,似没有必要建立语用学的元学科,元语用学的相关研究内容可归于语用学本身的研究范围。Metapragmatics discusses the way we define and do pragmatics , and examines issues such as why one definition of pragmatics is better than the other , what kind of relationship pragmatics has to semantics , how many principles we want to work with in pragmatics, whether or not we should include an activity such as conversational analysis in our pragmatic studies , and so on （Mey, 2001）.According to Mey, there are three ways of dealing with metapragmatics：（1） As a theoretical discussion on what pragmatics is, and what it should comprise;（2） As a discussion on the conditions and possibilities that enable people to act by using words , to＇do＇pragmatics by acting pragmatically;and （3） As the pragmatic pendant to the metalinguistic level , often captured under the label of＇reflexive language＇.The article, while making comments on Mey＇s Metapragmatics, suggests that it is not necessary to establish a new scientific category such as Metapragmatics .

关 键 词：“元语用学” 语用学 科学分类 

分 类 号：H15[语言文字—汉语]