基于因子分析法的科技期刊引文综合评价指标研究  

Exploration of comprehensive evaluation indicators of scientific journals based on factor analysis

作　　者：吴涛[1,2] 杨筠[2] 陈晨[2] 赵娟[3] 孙金立[2] 

机构地区：[1]第四军医大学<医学争鸣>编辑部 [2]第四军医大学图书馆,西安710032 [3]西安邮电大学外国语学院,西安710121

出　　处：《中国科技期刊研究》2015年第2期205-209,共5页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals

基　　金：2014年陕西省出版科学基金重点项目(14BSC05);陕西省教育厅2014年科研计划项目资助(14JK1645)

摘　　要：【目的】建立科技期刊引文综合评价指标函数,希望能对科技期刊引文综合评价工作提供参考意见。【方法】选用IF、IF5、h指数、SJR、ES和SNIP为具有代表性的核心引文评价指标,通过对Wo S数据库和Scopus数据库共有的1881种医学类期刊的这六大指标数值的因子分析。【结果】找出对它们起支配作用的潜在影响因素:公因子F1(平均影响力因子)和F2(整体影响力因子)。在权衡这两个因素的基础上,构建了综合引文评价指标函数。【结论】通过实例(选取专业期刊和综合期刊为样本)验证该综合指标能较好地消除期刊载文量对期刊综合影响力评价的影响。[ Purpose] To establish a formula of comprehensive evaluation indicator for scientific journals＇ citation with an attempt to offer some suggestions for comprehensive citation evaluation of scientific journals. [ Methodology ] We performed a factor analysis on the values of impact factor （ IF）, 5-year impact factor （ IF5 ）, h index, SCImago journal rank （ SJR）, Eigenfactor score （ES） and source normalized impact per paper （SNIP） of 1881 medical journals from WoS and Scopus databases. [ Findings] We extracted two potential factors （ also named principle components ） influencing the six indicator values ： F1 named average impact factor and F2 named overall impact factor. A formula of comprehensive evaluation indicator was constructed by weighing the two factors. [ Conclusions] With special and comprehensive journals as samples, the comprehensive indicator was proved empirically being able to eliminate the adverse effect of published document number on the evaluation of scientific journal impact.

关 键 词：科技期刊 引文评价 综合指标 因子分析 IF H指数 SJR ES SNIP 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]