检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭榆琴[1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学武汉学院,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第1期107-113,共7页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社科基金项目课题(07BZX046)
摘 要:司法过程是通过法律当事人之间的会话推进的,所以法律会话的过程就是法律推理的过程。法律会话推理就是在司法会话过程中,各方析出法律会话参与人说出话语的法律会话含义(一般会话含义和特殊会话含义),通过法律当事人的互动从前提推理结论的过程。法律会话推理具有普适性、主体间性和互动性的特点,其逻辑模式主要以语用逻辑作为"显"性逻辑,以形式逻辑作为其"隐"性逻辑,保证了法律推理的合理性和确定性的有机融合。Judicial process is developed through conversation between legal partner, so the process of conversation is the process of legal reasoning.This thesis analyzes legal reasoning from the new aspects of discourse analysis.Legal conversational reasoning is the process that in the judicial course,both legal partners know the true meaning (general conversational meaning and special conversational meaning) of counterpart from the conversation and they interactively inference the conclusion on the true mean- ing of the conversation.The characteristics of legal conversational reasoning include universality, in- tersubjectivity and interactivity.The logic of legal conversational reasoning is both pragmatic logic and formal logic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.243.141