检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李文博[1]
出 处:《湖北工业职业技术学院学报》2015年第1期50-55,共6页Journal of Hubei Industrial Polytechnic
摘 要:作为检务公开的重要方式,听证近年来在司法领域中被广泛运用。羁押必要性审查作为检察机关的新增职能,其行政化色彩浓重亟需改进。举行听证是推进检察权实现准司法化的重要途径,也是赋予羁押必要性审查司法化特征、平衡诉讼效率与人权保障的有效手段。本文以检察机关监所检察部门开展羁押必要性审查为例,对履行羁押必要性审查这一职能时的困难和问题进行深入分析,揭示在羁押必要性审查中引入听证制度的必要性与可行性,进而提出构建和完善羁押必要性审查听证制度的一系列制度设计,以期对司法实践有所裨益。as an important way of the openness of procuratorial work, hearing is wide]y used in the field of justice in recent years. Detention necessity review as a new function of the procuratorial organ, its heavy administrative color needs to be improved. Hearing is an important way to promote the realization of quasi judicialization of the prosecutorial power, but also an effective means of giving necessity of judicial review of detention characteristics, balance the efficiency of litigation and the protection of human rights. Taking an example of carrying out detention necessity review by the procuratorial organs of the procuratorial supervision departments, deeply analyses on the difiqculties and problems of the necessity of detention review, reveals the feasibility and necessity of introducing the hearing system of the necessity of detention review in the custody, and then puts forward a series of system to build and perfect the hearing system of necessity of detention review, in order to benefit the judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.164.11