检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:章绪辉[1] 全显跃[1] 路世龙[1] 黄凡衡[1]
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学珠江医院放射科,广东广州510280
出 处:《影像诊断与介入放射学》2014年第6期466-469,共4页Diagnostic Imaging & Interventional Radiology
摘 要:目的探讨3.0 T MR动态增强成像(DCE-MRI)在前列腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法收集疑诊前列腺癌者75例,所有患者均行T2WI和DCE-MRI检查。分析比较T2WI和DCE-MRI对前列腺癌诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性的差异,并分析DCE-MRI对前列腺癌的检出率和Gleason评分的相关性。结果前列腺癌患者44例,T2WI和DCE-MRI对前列腺癌诊断的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为64%和91%、58%和77%、61%和85%。DCE-MRI诊断敏感性和准确性明显高于T2WI(P<0.01),而特异性未见明显高于T2WI(P>0.05)。DCE-MRI对高分化组Gleason评分<7分的前列腺癌检出率明显低于对中低分化组Gleason评分≥7分的前列腺癌(P<0.05)。结论和T2WI相比,3.0 T DCE-MRI能明显提高对前列腺癌的诊断敏感性和准确性。而且,DCE-MRI更容易检出中低分化的前列腺癌。Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 3 T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI(DCE-MRI) for prostate cancer.Methods 75 patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer underwent T2-weighted MR imaging(T2WI) and DCEMRI.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of T2 WI and DCE-MRI for diagnosing prostate cancer were determined.The relationship between Gleason score and prostate cancer detection on DCE-MRI was also evaluated.Results Of 75 patients,prostate adenocarcinoma was confirmed histopathologically in 44.The sensitivity and accuracy of DCE-MRI(91%,85%) were significantly(P〈0.01) higher than those of T2WI(64%,61%).The specificity of DCE-MRI(77%) was not significantly(P〉0.05) higher than that of T2WI(58%).The detection rate for Gleason 4-6 cancers was significantly lower than that for Gleason 7-9 cancers(P〈0.05).Conclusion 3 T DCE-MRI is superior to T2 WI in prostate cancer detection and can detect more aggressive tumors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145