检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾克防[1]
出 处:《山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第2期7-12,共6页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:甘肃省高等学校科研项目(2013B-006)
摘 要:抽象学说是经验主义者处理普遍与个别的哲学关系的基本理论。在近代哲学争论中,贝克莱对洛克的抽象观念理论的批评已是老生常谈,然而,随着对这两位哲学家的逐渐深入的阅读,这场关于抽象观念的争论也获得了进行重新解读的可能。文章通过对洛克文本的研究,力图提出对洛克抽象学说的新解释,从而为之辩护。在此基础上,还将反驳当代的洛克研究者艾耶斯的"部分考虑"说的解释,验证文章的辩护方案。Empiricist usually adopt the doctrine of abstraction to deal with the relationship between universals and particulars. It is believed that John Locke' s abstraction doctrine is worn - out and George Berkeley' s criticism to him has become a cliche. However, as long as we read these two philosophers closely, their debates on the doctrine of abstraction are still interesting and inspiring. Contemporary scholars proposed several interpretations of Locke' s abstraction doctrine, such as Ayers' partial consideration interpretation. The author of this paper is critical to these interpretations and will give his new interpretation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30