3种颌面部创伤评分评估下颌骨骨折的比较研究  

A comparative study of three maxillofacial trauma scoring systems in mandible fracture grading

作　　者：陈晨[1,2] 张益[1] 安金刚[1] 贺洋[1] 巩玺[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学口腔医学院,100081 [2]青岛大学附属医院口腔颌面外科

出　　处：《实用口腔医学杂志》2015年第1期68-72,共5页Journal of Practical Stomatology

摘　　要：目的:比较2种颌面部创伤评分和一种下颌骨损伤评分用于下颌骨骨折严重度评估时有无差异。方法:对313例新鲜下颌骨骨折病例,应用MISS、MFISS、下颌骨损伤严重度评分(S5)3种颌面部创伤评分进行创伤严重度评分,对3种评分方法所得结果进行对比分析。结果:下颌骨损伤严重度评分与手术时间、手术费用、住院费用相关性最高,能有效区分单处骨折与多处骨折,是住院费用的显著影响因素。结论:下颌骨损伤严重度评分更适于下颌骨骨折损伤严重度的评估。Objective：To compare 3 maxillofacial trauma scoring systems in mandible fracture grading.Methods：Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score（MISS）,Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score（MFISS）,Mandible Injury Severity Score（S5）were used in the analysis of mandible fracture severity in 313 cases with mandible fractures.The results were statistically analyzed.Results：S5 score showed higher correlation with operation time,operation charge and hospitalization expenses than MFISS and MISS,and it could distinguish single and multiple mandible fractures effectively.It was also a significant factor affecting the cost of hospitalization.Conclusion：The Mandible Injury Severity Score was more suitable for the scoring of mandible fracture.

关 键 词：下颌骨骨折 颌面部创伤 创伤评分 

分 类 号：R782.4[医药卫生—口腔医学]