出 处:《中华肿瘤杂志》2015年第2期95-100,共6页Chinese Journal of Oncology
基 金:国家自然基金青年基金(81202071)
摘 要:目的:探讨溶血磷脂酸( LPA)诱导卵巢癌细胞侵袭转移的作用机制。方法采用裸鼠转移瘤模型检测卵巢癌细胞SK-OV3、HEY、OVCAR3、IGROV1的体内转移能力;Matrigel侵袭实验检测卵巢癌细胞对LPA的体外反应性;采用Rac (-)或Rac (+)腺病毒感染相应卵巢癌细胞,检测其LPA反应性的改变;谷胱甘肽巯基转移酶融合蛋白下拉分析检测经LPA诱导后Rac、Cdc42、RhoA活化水平。结果裸鼠转移瘤实验显示,接种SK-OV3和HEY细胞的裸鼠,体内布满转移瘤,该细胞为侵袭性卵巢癌细胞;接种OVCAR3和IGROV1细胞的裸鼠,体内无明显转移瘤,该细胞为非侵袭性卵巢癌细胞。 Matrigel侵袭实验显示,LPA刺激前后,SK-OV3细胞A值分别为0.594±0.023和1.697±0.049,HEY细胞A值分别为0.804±0.070和1.851±0.095,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01);LPA刺激前后,OVCAR3细胞A值分别为0.336±0.017和0.374±0.007,IGROV1细胞A值分别为0.491±0.036和0.479±0.061,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。 SK-OV3和HEY细胞对LPA反应性良好,OVCAR3和IGROV1细胞对LPA反应性较差。卵巢癌细胞的体内转移能力与其对LPA的反应性呈正相关(r=0.983,P<0.05)。 Rac(-)腺病毒感染前后,SK-OV3细胞对LPA诱导的细胞侵袭倍增能力分别为2.988±0.095和0.997±0.100,HEY细胞对LPA诱导的细胞侵袭倍增能力分别为2.404±0.059和0.901±0.072,差异均有统计学意义(均P=0.01),Rac(-)腺病毒可阻断侵袭性卵巢癌细胞对LPA诱导的反应。 Rac(+)腺病毒感染前后,OVCAR3细胞对LPA诱导的细胞侵袭倍增能力分别为1.072±0.080和1.898±0.078, IGROV1细胞对LPA诱导的细胞侵袭倍增能力分别为1.002±0.044和2.141±0.057,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.05),Rac(+)腺病毒可使非侵袭性卵巢癌细胞对LPA的诱导�Objective To investigate the mechanisms of lysophosphatidic acid ( LPA ) in stimulating invasion and metastatic colonization of ovarian cancer cells. Methods The metastatic ability in vivo of ovarian cancer SK-OV3, HEY, OVCAR3, and IGROV1 cells was determined in tumor-bearing nude mouse models. Matrigel assay was used to detect the changes of response in vitro of ovarian cancer cells to LPA after Rac( -) or Rac( +) adenovirus treatment. LPA-induced Rho GTPase activation was detected by GST-fusion protein binding assay. Results The peritoneal metastatic colonization assay showed overt metastatic colonization in mice receiving SK-OV3 and HEY cell inoculation, indicating that they are invasive cells. Metastatic colonization was not detected in animals receiving OVCAR3 and IGROV1 cells, indicating that these cells are non-invasive cells. In the matrigel invasion assay, exposure to LPA led to a notably greater migratory response in metastatic SK-OV3 and HEY cells (Optical density:SK-OV3 cells:0. 594 ± 0. 023 vs. 1. 697 ± 0. 049, P〈0. 01; HEY cells:0. 804 ± 0. 070 vs. 1. 851 ± 0. 095, P〈0. 01). But LPA did little in the non-metastatic OVCAR3 and IGROV1 cells (Optical density A:OVCAR3 cells:0. 336 ± 0. 017 vs. 0. 374 ± 0. 007, P 〉0. 05;IGROV1 cells: 0. 491 ± 0. 036 vs. 0. 479 ± 0. 061, P 〉0. 05). LPA migratory responses of ovarian cancer cells were closely related to their metastatic colonization capabilities (r=0.983, P〈0.05). Rac( -) blocked the LPA response of invasive SK-OV3 and HEY cells (LPA-induced fold increase of cell migration:SK-OV3 cells:2. 988 ± 0. 095 vs. 0. 997 ± 0. 100,P=0. 01; HEY cells:2. 404 ± 0. 059 vs. 0. 901 ± 0. 072, P=0. 01). But Rac( +) confered the non-invasive cells with LPA response and invasion capability ( LPA-induced fold increase of cell migration: OVCAR3 cells:1. 072 ± 0. 080 vs. 1. 898 ± 0. 078,P 〈0. 01; IGROV1 cells: 1. 002 ± 0. 044 vs. 2. 141 ± 0. 057, P 〈0. 05). Among Rho GTPases, only R
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...