宋代疑《书》思想研究  

On the Skepticism About The Book of History in the Song Dynasty

作　　者：陈良中[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆师范大学文学院,重庆401331

出　　处：《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第1期32-44,共13页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(08CZS006)

摘　　要：宋代学者疑辨《尚书》由字词、语序、篇序而至今古文《尚书》、大小《序》《孔传》,字词、语序的疑辨各家不一。对文序的疑辨主要集中在《武成》《洪范》两篇,对古文《尚书》、大小《序》《孔传》疑辨成为宋以后《尚书》研究的重要内容。疑辨由枝节而至全体,开启了只解今文《尚书》、古文《尚书》证伪以及汉代今古文《尚书》辑佚研究的新方向。辨伪对于学界正确认识《尚书》文本有重要意义,但又带有随意改经的流弊。梳理宋代疑《尚书》资料,无疑可以考见《尚书》学之演进。Scholars in the Song Dynasty were skeptical about The Book of History mainly in the diction,word order and order of the chapters of the book. This skeptical attitude is influential even today,hence different skeptical suggestions about the ancient edition of The Book of History,long and brief Forewords and Confucian Biography,diction and word order. Scholars offered doubt about The Wucheng and The Hongfan mainly for the order of chapters,while those skeptical suggestions about the ancient edition of The Book of History,long and brief Forewords and Confucian Biography became the important part of studies of The Book of History since the Song Dynasty. The skeptical suggestions about The Book of History varied from minor matters to the body text as a whole,starting a new orientation of studies of The Book of History which emphasizes interpretation only of the modern script,falsification of the ancient edition and re-edition of both modern and ancient scripts of The Book of History. Therefore,a re-examination of those documents skeptical about The Book of History will no doubt understand the evolution of studies of The Book of History.

关 键 词：宋代学术 今文《尚书》 古文《尚书》 

分 类 号：B244[哲学宗教—中国哲学]