检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵玉红[1] 张惠[1] 王彬[1] 孔迅[1] 李乾[1] 孙秀明[1] 倪海英[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学第一医院超声诊断中心,北京100034
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2015年第2期258-262,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
摘 要:目的探讨超声自动乳腺全容积扫描(ABVS)技术在乳腺肿块BI-RADS分类(3~5类)的价值。方法回顾性分析235例(共250个结节)手持超声(HUS)诊断为BI-RAD S 3~5类、同时接受ABVS检查的患者。分别应用HUS和HUS+ABVS对乳腺病变进行BI-RADS分类,以病理结果为金标准,分别计算HUS和HUS+ABVS诊断乳腺肿块的敏感度、特异度和准确率,ROC曲线分析并比较两种方法的诊断效能。结果 250个结节中,HUS诊断3~5类乳腺病变的敏感度100%(103/103),特异度69.39%(102/147),准确率82.00%(205/250);HUS+ABVS的敏感度100%(103/103),特异度80.95%(119/147),准确率88.80%(222/250)。ABVS+HUS诊断BI-RADS 3~5类病变的ROC曲线下面积为0.973,大于HUS的0.940(P=0.032)。通过"汇聚征"诊断乳腺恶性肿瘤的敏感度、特异度及准确率分别为65.05%(67/103)、95.92%(141/147)、83.20%(208/250)。两种方法对乳腺病变卫星灶的检出率差异有统计学意义(χ^2=30.78,P〈0.05),但对于乳腺肿块内钙化及周围导管扩张的检出率差异无统计学意义(X^2=2.56、1.22,P均〉0.05)。结论 HUS+ABVS技术在准确判断乳腺占位病变BI-RADS分类、鉴别肿瘤良恶性方面优于HUS。ABVS对于乳腺肿块的钙化、导管扩张及卫星灶的发现具有重要补充作用。Objective To explore the value of automated breast volume scanner(ABVS)in classifying lesions(rank 3—5in breast imaging reporting and data system [BI-RADS]).Methods Totally 235 patients with 250 breast lesions who underwent both handheld ultrasound(HUS)and ABVS were enrolled,who were diagnosed as BI-RADS 3—5by HUS.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of HUS and ABVS+HUS were calculated to evaluate the BI-RADS classification of breast lesions taking the pathology as the gold standard,and the diagnostic performances of the two methods were compared using ROC analysis.Results Of the 250 breast lesions,the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of HUS alone were100%(103/103),69.39%(102/147)and 82.00%(205/250),and those of ABVS+ HUS were 100%(103/103),80.95%(119/147)and 88.80%(222/250).The area under curve(AUC)of the diagnostic models based on ABVS+HUS(AUC=0.973)was higher than that of the model based on HUS alone(AUC=0.940,P=0.032).The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of the contraction sign to diagnostic malignancy were 65.05%(67/103),95.92%(141/147),83.20%(208/250).The detection rate of the satellite lesions using ABVS was significantly higher than that of using HUS(χ^2=30.78,P0.05),but no differences were found between the two techniques to detect the internal calcification and adjacent mammary duct dilation of the breast lesions(χ^2=2.56,1.22,both P〉0.05).Conclusion Compared with HUS,the combination of ABVS and HUS demonstrates higher value in breast lesion's BI-RADS classification and malignance or benignity differentiation.ABVS is a valuable complementary technique for HUS to recognize the internal calcification,mammary duct dilation,and satellite lesions of the breast lesions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46